Legislation Would Ban State-Designated “Biodiversity Areas”

Other episodes in this series: 
IPR News Features
Date: 
February 18, 2013
Photo: David Roberts, MSU Extension.

By Rick Pluta

There’s a hearing this week in Lansing on legislation that would stop the state from setting aside hundreds of acres strictly for the purpose of nurturing native plants and animals.

Opponents and supporters of the legislation packed a hearing last week on the measure.

“To do away with that designation, to me, is a big step backwards in the protection of what makes Michigan ‘Pure Michigan,’” says Democratic state Senator Rebekah Warren.

But Republican state Senator Tom Casperson says there are already too many restrictions on public land. He says more access to trees, wildlife, minerals and other natural resources could help create business opportunities and jobs. 

“What’s the balance here?” he asks. “Because right now they’ve got a lot of tools to do exactly what they’re trying to do here. Why this one?”

He lists executive orders, wilderness areas and the invasive species act as examples of other tools available to protect native plants and wildlife.

Casperson’s legislation would also scrub from the law books a finding that human activity is the primary culprit behind habitat loss.

Community Discussion Rules

Comments

I fully support State Senator

I fully support State Senator Warren in her advocacy for the protection of the environment against those who seem intent on disemboweling the opportunities we currently have to protect our native plants and animals. It is very disheartening to see that some put such little value on the riches we have around us, unless they can convert those to just dollars and cents. Mr. Casperson in particular seems to be on a campaign to undo so much of the good work that has been done on behalf of the environment, such as his interest last year in promoting motorized vehicles in conservancy areas. Adding insult to injury, his legislation would remove from the law books the finding that human activity is the primary culprit behind habitat loss! Does he also believe that Neil Armstrong's moon landing was a stunt? Does he believe that the earth is indeed flat? Hopefully sanity will prevail.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.