Conservatives Challenge Republican Incumbent In Grand Traverse

Other episodes in this series: 
IPR News Features
Date: 
August 2, 2012
Photographs from Sarah Payette and Michigan House Republicans

Listen

You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialise correctly.

By Peter Payette

Some Republicans in Traverse City say State Representative Wayne Schmidt isn’t conservative enough. They’re supporting a challenger in next week’s Republican primary. Schmidt easily fended off a challenge from within his own party last election and it looks like a tall order to unseat the incumbent this year too.

Tea Party challenger

Instead of red and blue, Jason Gillman colors his campaigns yellow and black. That’s yellow like the Gadsden flag often flown at Tea Party events with a coiled rattlesnake on it.  Even if people miss that connection, Gillman says his supporters stand out at Friday Night Live in Traverse City. 

“We definitely get our attention.”

Jason Gillman is a commissioner in Grand Traverse County and publishes the blog Right Michigan. He’d like to see a more conservative agenda in Lansing that reduces the size and scope of government. Eliminating state funding for economic development programs like the travel campaign Pure Michigan is a top item on his agenda. And he’d like to see Michigan become a right-to-work state because he thinks it’s morally wrong to force someone to pay union dues. He says right-to-work legislation could have come through the commerce committee chaired by his opponent, Wayne Schmidt.

“But our representative is saying that, even with all branches of state government in Republican or presumably conservative control, it’s not the right time.”

Gillman is not alone in his frustrations.

Randy McClure wants to see Republicans do all they can to block President Obama’s healthcare law from being implemented. And McClure doesn’t think Wayne Schmidt is up for the fight.

"I don’t get the feeling that there’s any passion there for the conservative causes,” says the Old Mission resident. “I mean the things that are going to make a difference for this nation and this state.”

Incumbent stands by job performance

Wayne Schmidt has no apologies for people who think he’s not sufficiently conservative. He’s proud of his record in Lansing.

Schmidt thinks the unemployment reforms worked out in his commerce committee this past session are a model for other states. He says the legislature has cut taxes, dealt with structural deficits and improved the state’s bond rating.

“We’re doing the right things.”

Schmidt says it makes no sense to adopt an ideological stance when making public policy. When asked about his opponent’s criticism of state funded economic development programs like Pure Michigan he gets a big grin on his face.

“Pure Michigan is the best thing for the state… It’s a home run”

And Schmidt says he fought for other economic development programs that were cut back by Governor Snyder, like brownfield redevelopment programs. That’s state support for companies that redevelop abandoned, and often polluted, sites like the state hospital in Traverse City. He says he’d like to see more money go to brownfield redevelopment.

Does the Tea Party have traction in Traverse City?

Jason Gillman and his supporters appear to have an uphill fight against the two-term incumbent. The Michigan Campaign Finance Network reports Wayne Schmidt has raised eight-times as much money as the challenger.

The 104th State House District now covers only Grand Traverse County. And if 2010 results mean anything, the county might have less appetite for Tea Party politics than other parts of northern Michigan.

In the last general election Randy Bishop ran a similar campaign against Howard Walker for the open senate seat. Bishop tried to position himself as the true conservative and Walker as a status quo, GOP insider. But Bishop had his weakest showing in Grand Traverse County drawing just 25 percent of the primary vote.

As a county commissioner, Gillman has much better name recognition going in and he thinks the vote will be close. Either way he figures its good for the party to have a primary race so conservative issues stay in discussion rather than having an incumbent on the sidelines waiting for the fall.

 

Community Discussion Rules

Comments

Gillman vs. Schmidt

After watching Jason Gillman work as a commissioner over the years, I'm convinced he is the representative we need in Lansing. He is not afraid to deal with tough issues. He doesn't stick his finger up in the air to see which way the wind is blowing. Like many people in our district, Gillman is a Grand Traverse County small business owner. He understands what it takes to run a business, make a payroll, pay the bills and taxes, and work with employees. As a husband and father he understands the importance of caring for a family, educating children, and giving back to the community. The American Legion veterans ran a children's baseball team for 60 years when suddenly the county came in and took over the program. Membership dropped and the program began to fall apart. Gillman volunteered hours to work with the Legion to get the baseball program back into the hands of the veterans who once again brought it back to success. That shows leadership. That shows strength. Jason Gillman is the person whom I feel deserves to be our representative in Lansing.

Jason Gillman v Wayne Schmidt

Jason Gillman is more constitutionally alert in ways which the state can combat implementation of Obamacare in Michigan. While Wayne would follow Governor Snyder's lead in implementing Healthcare Exchanges via Federal dollars and the resultant mandate, Gillman would work with a coalition of other representatives to Nullify ObamaCare in the Michigan legislature. Therefore, Jason Gillman is key to stopping the greatest federal government intrusion into the private health of citizens of our state. And that is why I recommend Jason Gillman for state representative for the 104th District.

If a state opts out,

If a state opts out, hospitals would lose both DSH funds and reimbursements from “Obamacare” for the newly insured. The state would be forced to either pass along the costs, cut services, go to the state taxpayers or even go bankrupt and close their doors. That doesn't sound fiscally conservative to me. It sounds like passing more costs on to the taxpayer.

Tea Party challenge

I've known Mr. Schmidt for many years, sat on boards with him, and have watched his political career with interest. I consider myself moderate and fiscally conservative and have been disappointed that to my taste Mr. Schmidt has "drunk the cool-aid" of the far right a bit too often for my taste. To see him challenged by a candidate that finds him too moderate seems absurd to me. Although individuals in our country may not be moderate, as a whole we are a moderate people when the extremes are factored in. The current fad of absolutist extreme political play undermines the compromise that in my opinion is the just outcome of our varied views. I'd hate to see the Tea Party exert more control than they do already. I'm glad to see Mr. Gillman present himself as an extreme politician, hopefully voters will consider this in the next election cycle for his commissioner seat.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.