Michigan Supreme Court Takes Case On 'Right To Remain Silent'

Other episodes in this series: 
IPR News Features
Date: 
April 2, 2012

By Rick Pluta

The state Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether police officers in Michigan must end the conversation once a suspect asserts the right to remain silent.

In the case before the court, Kadeem Dennis White was brought in for questioning after a man was gunned down in what appeared to be a robbery attempt. White said he wanted to remain silent and the detective stopped asking questions - but he did not stop talking to White. Eventually, White responded to the detective's statements, saying he didn't mean to do it and it was an accident. White was charged with first-degree murder.

The defense wants those statements thrown out, arguing the conversation was effectively a continuation of the interrogation after White asserted his Fifth Amendment rights. The prosecution argues the detective acted within the rules, and had no way of knowing that White might blurt out something incriminating.

Community Discussion Rules

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.