Are The Great Lakes Losing Water?

Other episodes in this series: 
IPR News Features
Date: 
May 5, 2011

Listen

You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialise correctly.

By Bob Allen

There's continuing debate over whether the Great Lakes are losing water.

This weekend, Traverse City will host a conference on Saving the Great Lakes.

It will feature an international speaker who says, without stronger protections, demand for fresh water in coming decades may leave the lakes "bone dry".

Scientists who study the lakes say that claim is misleading.

Canadian "Ralph Nader"
Maude Barlow is sometimes described as the "Canadian Ralph Nader" when it comes to protecting fresh water.

She chairs a citizen activist group called the Council of Canadians.

She says there's a misconception that water in the Great Lakes replenishes itself every year with rainfall.

Barlow says a significant amount of the water is consumed every day, to grow and process food for example.

"And I think you'll find a lot of this water is actually leaving the Great Lakes Basin in the form of industrial products that get exported, in the form of commodity products that get exported, in the form of bottled water, in the form of diversions that don't come back."

Pumping Too Much?
In her new report Barlow looks at recent scientific studies of the Great Lakes.

She says the amount of fresh water pumped out of the ground to meet human needs is a growing concern.

For instance, she says deep wells in the Chicago area reach as far underground as the city's tallest skyscrapers.

And Barlow says a study shows those wells are capturing groundwater that ordinarily flows into Lake Michigan.

In fact the wells are pumping so hard they're beginning to pull water from the bottom of the lake. 

Barlow says that worldwide thirsty countries are extracting groundwater at a rapidly increasing rate.

She highlights research that predicts in twenty years demand for fresh water will outstrip supply.

And she takes that to be a warning for the Great Lakes.

 "If we are pumping the water and the groundwater of the Great Lakes as fast as groundwater is being pumped around the world the Great Lakes could be bone dry in 80 years. Now they're not saying they will be but they're saying if the extraction rate around the Great Lakes is as great as the global extraction rate, we're in trouble."

Scientists Disagree with Report
Barlow doesn't know exactly how much water is being removed from the Lakes.

But she's concerned that scientists don't have a good handle on it either.

Jim Nicholas is with the U.S. Geological Survey.

He says scientists do know that all of the withdrawals for human use in the entire Great Lakes Basin are dwarfed by the amounts that cycle through the system from rainfall, evaporation and rivers flowing into the lakes.

"The water's replenished every year on about the same amount that it leaves the watershed. That's why the water levels in the great lakes pretty much fluctuate around some mean or average water level since historical times."

Nicholas says Barlow's paper is misleading.

The U.S.G.S. did the study of groundwater in the Chicago area.

And he says the amount of water that is being drawn from Lake Michigan by the pumps there essentially is a slow trickle.

Water Diversions
In contrast, Nicholas says, there are some fairly large diversions of water both into and out of the Great Lakes.

For instance, the Chicago Diversion pulls a river of water away from Lake Michigan every day for the city's wastewater treatment.

Nicholas says that only lowers the lake level by a little more than a couple of inches.

And he says that amount is more than offset by giant diversions of water into the Great Lakes system from rivers in the far north of Canada.

 "The diversions into the Great Lakes at Lake Superior raise the lake levels on Michigan and Huron by about five inches. So, really if you look at diversions, it's a positive number not a negative number."

Small Net Loss
Jim Nicholas says overall there is a net loss from the system when you consider all human consumption of water.

But he says it's a tiny fraction, less than one percent, of the amount that flows through the cycle from all sources every year.

So Nicholas says it's very unlikely that such a water-rich region will ever be pumped "bone dry" as Barlow suggests may happen.

But Maude Barlow is convinced that demands on Great Lakes water will slowly deplete the supply.

And in her paper she calls for a moratorium on any new groundwater pumping in the region until more studies are done.

 "Collectively we're losing a lot of water from the Great Lakes every year. The work that I've done here frankly skims the surface. What we need is to get some scientists really looking at this issue in a much deeper way and asking the question about where has the water from the Great Lakes gone."

Maude Barlow will give a keynote speech at the State Theater in Traverse City Friday evening to kick off the "Saving the Great Lakes Forever" conference.

Community Discussion Rules

Comments

ballast water action Obama delay

Dose anybody think it is odd that we can not seem to create US environmental protection for ballast water when we have a Secretary of state that used to work for walmart, now negotiating trade with China one of the largest ship builders in the world? Dose it seem strange that when Mrs. Clinton worked with the NY DEC on the creation of baitfish regulations allowing transportation of fish from Arkansas (the largest supplier of bait fish in the country) into NY waters that the transport water with chemicals and water additions added outside of NY states jurisdiction was not an issue before being dumped in NY waters, but water sources in NY used to raise bait fish were?

party discussions on ballast water cost v/s human health

Anyone who follows the history of ballast water should realize that after Senator Boxer killed legislation in 2008 passed in the House 395-7, to protect us from ballast water our politicians have been caving in to foreign shipping which constitutes the majority of flag ships in US waters. They currently have discussions going on in Congress concerning the economic problems this would create for shipping. California's action reversing their stance for tough regulations despite Senator Boxers claim that the legislation she killed for the whole country was not strong enough, points out the political game they are playing with American health an environment. Not a single piece of new legislation has been introduced in Congress by either party since, and the EPA had to be sued to even address the idea of creating a standard. Our President as commander and chief, three years after allegedly supporting congressional legislation in 2008 has done nothing but allow a continuous delay on Coast Guard standards, the latest being a delay to "correlate" ( after the next presidential election) with a yet undeveloped EPA standard. New York's governor, as attorney general developed their purposed tough standards and has now delayed them in conjunction. It is about our dependence on foreign manufactured products to bolster our economy, and sadly although America was capable of putting a man on the moon, because shipping interest say that: " technology is not out there " significant action will probably never be taken. What ever weak action is taken environmentalist will have to accept and new shipping investments to develop a fix for the problem will be minimal as they know the political will is gone the same as many of the politicians who did care, Granholm, Schwarzenegger, Patterson, Strickland, Oberstar, etc. Interesting with the political help of our President, Senator Boxer the person responsible for killing national ballast water legislation was reelected. Not surprising since the issue of ballast water is never public-ally broad cast by the news media, despite the severe affects the way it is handled will affect both, Americans and the worlds health and environment forever. The ironic travesty will be the way some who claim to care about environmental stewardship along with the shipping interest will portray weak action with respect and decorum as a great achievement, further destroying a chance for future significant actions. Shipping has won as this problem is not even close to being solved.

Great Lakes Forever Conference

The comment so far show the authors do not know what the Saving the Great Lakes Forever Conference was about. The Conference gathered leading advocates and experts from citizen organizations far beyond the traditional environmental groups. The purpose, and it succeeded, was to address the issues, from many points of view -- Asian Carp, fracking shale for natural gas (here and in the West), sulfide mining, inasive species, privatization of water supplies, shifts of water law toward export and private control, nuclear waste, bottled water, leaks in the Great Lakes Compact, effects of NAFTA, and more. The Conference brought forth a new, groundbreaking movement -- regardless of the impacs or threats today, the single most important principle for citizens and governments is to declare water as a commons protected by public trust. This is the only way to safeguard now the power and threat of forces far beyond the Great Lakes to exploit or export Great Lakes water.

Water loss?

Turn-OFF Niagara Falls!

"Saving the Great Lakes Forever"

The title, itself, is one example of how difficult is to take Ms. Barlow seriously. There is no forever, not in the geologic history of the planet, & certainly not in the life of the Great Lakes. Since the retreat of the last glacial advance, the crust in the Great Lakes region has been undergoing isostatic rebound. If one looks at the beach terrace deposits in less developed portions of the Great Lakes shoreline, this is evident. Isostasy, in and of itself, is enough to gradually drain the lakes, given sufficient time. Do I dispute the probability that our fresh water resources are being used or contaminated at an alarming rate? Not in the least. I just wish folks would stop with the "sky is falling" hyperbole. It turns a serious problem into a joke for too much of the public, especially when there are parties out there with a vested interest in the status quo and take great glee in helping any opposition look as foolish as possible.

Obama and Great Lakes restoration and ballast water

American Great Lakes restoration is now more about spending the majority of Federal money to protect the economic interest of the Presidents home state, it is not about ending the chance of asian carp destroying the fishing industry in Canada or all Great Lakes states, nor pollution and water usage. National ballast water delay continues as President Obama again tries to negotiate currency manipulation with a communist country that pollutes both water and air as they transport foreign manufactured products. President Obama's ballast water policy is about maintaining the status quo of borrowing to provide entitlements and cheap manufactured goods to the largest employment sector, which Americans can strive for to provide the "new" American dream of a store clerk. The international approach for ballast water is being pursued, which continues to follow the IMO an organization made up of mainly foreign economic shiping interest. The international timetable for technology inatalation is being decided by the cost the shipping industry would inccur. This continues the concept of economic globalization without regard for environmental destruction or human health affects to America and the rest of the world, including the Great Lakes and Canada. I wonder how much of Presidents Obama's Ocean initiative effort is now being diverted to clean up the hidden pollution created using experimental disspersant to sink and hide the pollution from the Gulf disaster?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.